The following are a few of the articles written about Stephen Paternite's Artwork,
Taken from The Akron Beacon Journal.
I
NOT THE CAT'S MEOW: Canton Art Exhibit Stirs Fuss
II
'KATS' Make Sense In Show's Context
III
Now, Let's All Paws For Art Appreciation
IV
Just A Critter Today, But It's Art Tomorrow
V
Cat Fan Would Love To Claw This Creature
VI
Editorial Cartoon
**Netscape Users must scroll down to view articles.
Additional articles and letters: Creature-Nites of Ohio Controversy
Back to Top

Back to Top
NOT THE CAT'S MEOW
CANTON ART EXHIBIT STIRS FUSS


Friday, September 15, 1989

Section: METRO: Page: A1

By Cristal Williams Walker, Beacon Journal staff writer

A controversial exhibit using body parts from dead cats and baby dolls opens today, at the Canton Art Institute. The local exhibit may allow local art lovers to join the national debate over controversial art supported by tax money, an issue debated Wednesday, by the U.S. House of Representatives. The House refused to ban federal funds for artwork deemed obscene or indecent. Opponents argued that the issue was not censorship but how to spend public money. The national debate concerns an exhibit of 153 photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe -- 13 of which included images of sadomasochistic homosexual sex. The local debate concerns an exhibit of imaginary animal sculptures fashioned by Akron artist Stephen Paternite from freeze-dried animal parts and baby dolls. He said he was furious that museum officials would suggest censoring his work by requesting that he pull three of his most controversial displays.

`I was appalled that anything would be censored,' the 37-year-old artist said. He said he is an animal lover and hasn't actually killed any of the animals. He said he took them off the streets after they were hit by automobiles or bought stuffed cats at taxidermy supply houses or garage sales. Museum Director M.J. Albacete said he told Paternite that some museum visitors were upset over the cat displays, and he asked if Paternite wanted to withdraw those sculptures, but that he was not trying to censor Paternite's work. Albacete said he was merely trying to be sensitive to the community's feelings about `unique and unusual' art.

`I'm trying to do the right thing,' Albacete said. `I guess I needed his reassurance.' Albacete said he is surprised Paternite's displays would spark controversy. `This is not a Mapplethorpe,' Albacete said. `This is not a flag that is pasted on the floor for people to walk on. It asks us to alter the way we perceive the care and treatment of animals.'

The exhibit, Creature-Nites of Ohio, was created by Paternite and his two brothers. Paternite said the display shows the endless possibilities of creating new hybrid species of imaginary Ohio critters. A statement on the exhibit from Paternite said his interest in the environment and animals led to experiments with taxidermy and animal forms as sculptures.

One display in question is
Kiddie Kat, which has the body of a cat with a baby doll head. The second, Kiddie Kat II, has the body of a doll with the head of a Siamese cat. The third, Robocat, is a freeze-dried kitten head and tail with a molded rubber body. Paternite said the Creature-Nites display has been shown before, but this is the first exhibit of Kiddie Kat I and II. Albacete, who describes Paternite's work as `creative and ingenious,' said the question of artistic freedom must always be defended. `Art is not there for our humor. It's there for our education. Sometimes it can be harsh,' he said.

Susan Dickson of the Ohio Arts Council said she has seen Paternite's exhibit, but not the Kiddie Kat sculptures. She said the council supported Paternite with a $5,000 grant. If Paternite was `harming animals to get his supply of animal parts, I think we'd have a problem,' she said. She said the exhibit will `rattle some people, but that's sort of the purpose of art.' Paternite says some of the displays are meant to be humorous, such as
Primalsaurus Rex, a sculpture with duck's feet, dried owl claws, a doll head and plastic torso. Others are more serious. A collage of dead pigeons is a memorial to 106 pigeons killed in 1987 in Columbus. [Mechanicsburg Pigeon Massacre].

Paternite said he enjoys the controversy his work is provoking. `I like controversy,' he said. `It's the cement that binds most artwork.' Creature-Nites and two other exhibits, Historic Architecture in Canton, a photo documentation, and The Grand Canyon: A Painting by Joseph Digiorgio, will be presented in a reception from 6:30 to 9 p.m. today.

Back to Top

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Back to Top
'KATS' MAKE SENSE IN SHOW'S CONTEXT

Saturday, September 16, 1989

Section: LIFE STYLE: Page: A1

By Dorothy Shinn, Beacon Journal art critic

This show is, in case you've been hibernating the last 24 hours, the talk not only of the area and the state, but the whole country, having been picked up by Cable News Network and most of the wire services by late Friday.
Stephen Paternite's exhibit, Creature-Nites of Ohio at the Canton Art Institute through Oct. 29, features both sculptured and real animal parts recombined to form new fantasy creatures, three of which involve the use of baby doll parts.

The works causing the most controversy,
Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II (homo sapien felis catus), have been compared with some of the more shocking photographs by the late photographer Robert Mapplethorpe. His government-funded photography exhibit showing homosexual activity was canceled this summer in Washington, D.C.

In Paternite's exhibit, the use of real cat parts in combination with doll parts is shocking because in these two works the artist obviously had to perform a cat decapitation (not to mention a de-tail-ation). Taken out of the context of the exhibit, these sculptures are jarring -- there's no way around it. But within the context of the show, the works not only make sense, they also tend to lose their shock effect.

The exhibit is black humor, a put-on, you see. But it's more. It's a tongue-in-cheek jab at natural history exhibits in which you find stuffed animals in their `natural' environments with plaques telling about their habitats, range, food sources and rarity. Paternite has done this, too, but with made-up animals.

One of them,
Rackeydeer, was in the All Ohio exhibit in the spring at the Canton museum. It shows a creature that looks like an upright groundhog with deer antlers growing from its back.

Another,
Robocock, shows a freeze-dried rooster body atop molded plastic mechanical legs. Its counterpart, Robocat, has a freeze-dried cat head and tail on a molded rubber animal body that's been painted silver.

A third,
Crocoturtle, shows a dried crocodile head emerging from a freeze- dried snapping turtle body. Nearby, the Mechanicsburg Pigeon Massacre refers to the authorized slaughter of 106 pigeons in 1987.

In all, there are 24 fantasy creatures, 21 color photographs and a 15-minute video made by Paternite's brother. Paternite said most of his animals are road kills found in the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area. The others -- namely, the freeze-dried cats, crocodiles and turtles -- come from a medical supply company in Chicago that supplies not only pharmacies but taxidermists with freeze-dried animals.

Those of us who are shocked and repelled by the idea of dead animals being used in this way have every right to our feelings, but we must stop and think about the implications of this exhibit beyond the shocking face of it. What, for instance, is responsible for all those road kills? Why are cats such an abundant, if grisly, commodity? Who is responsible for, or, should we say, who has dominion over them?

The implications go on and on -- it makes a person think. Maybe that's why so many feel shocked. Thinking can have that effect.

Back to Top
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back to Top

NOW, LET'S ALL PAWS FOR ART APPRECIATION

Sunday, September 17, 1989

Section: METRO: Page: C1

by Stuart Warner

My hat is off to Akron sculptor Stephen Paternite. He has given me a new appreciation of art. Finally, someone has discovered a good use for cats. You may have read Friday, about the opening of Paternite's exhibit of animal sculptures this weekend at the Canton Art Institute.

This story rated Page One because two of his works --
Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II -- have set off something of a controversy among museumgoers. In both sculptures, Paternite fused the body parts of dead cats and plastic baby dolls. Kiddie Kat has a doll's head mounted on a cat's body. Kiddie Kat II, the sequel, is reversed. The cat's head and tail are attached to the doll's body. At least he got maximum use out of the materials at hand.

It should be noted that Paternite claims that he did not harm any of the cats in his exhibit. He found them dead along the side of the road. If Paternite's show attracts a large following, toy manufacturers may have a whole new product line -- and just in time for Christmas, too.

Imagine the possibilities:
The Siamese Barbie -- with a plastic chest, of course.
G.I. Tomcat.
Catsy-Wetsy.
Cabbage Patch Cats.

But most importantly, the artist makes a powerful statement with his work -- which is why it is referred to as `art' instead of `oooh, gross!' Anyway, to me he is saying that cats have contributed more to culture than dogs. I don't agree, though I will concede that felines have played a more prominent role in the world of art. Cats have been instrumental to the development of music -- i.e., guitar strings.

Cats also are featured in literature, notably in that best seller 101 Things to Do With a Dead Cat. And what is Spuds McKenzie but a rip-off of Morris the Cat and Garfield?

Back to Top
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Back to Top

JUST A CRITTER TODAY, BUT IT'S ART TOMORROW

Sunday, September 24, 1989

Section: TMC: Page: A1

Stuart Warner

What happened to the chicken that didn't make it across the road? It's now an art exhibit in Canton.
Oooooh. Only a sick puppy would tell a joke like that. I'm sorry. I'll try not to do it again. I just haven't been able to restrain myself. I've slipped to new depths of sophomoric humor since the opening of
Stephen Paternite's dead-pet show at the Canton Art Institute. I hope the artist doesn't take me to court over this. I've never had a Paternite suit filed against me before.

Anyway, the most talked-about pieces in the exhibit have been
Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II. Each sculpture was created by the fusion of the body parts of dead cats and baby dolls. Naturally, the always art-conscious news media has been intrigued by Paternite's work. Reports of the exhibit have been carried throughout the country. Can a guest-appearance on Geraldo! be far behind?

This sort of recognition is certain to inspire other artists. A few years ago, the art world was wowed by Judy Chicago's elaborate creation, The Dinner Party. Will we soon see a down-home sequel composed of freeze-dried road kill? I might suggest West Virginia Feast as a title. Or perhaps the limbs from a dead baboon could be used to give the Venus de Milo those sorely needed arms. Of course, if there's money to be made by putting dead critters on display, no possum ever again will feel safe crossing the street. Not that any have made it yet.

Stan Piatt of radio station WNIR in Kent suggested that a best seller of a few years ago should now be retitled 102 Things to Do With a Dead Cat. And it is interesting to note that a currently popular rip-off of that book is 101 Things to Do With a Dead Lawyer. You have to believe that critics might have considered Paternite's exhibit more humane if he had used the body parts of dead attorneys instead of cats. But don't get the idea that anyone should harm a lawyer just for an art show. I'm sure there are plenty who can be found along the side of the road. A lot of unhappy clients drive cars. Cheap shot. Cheap shot. If this puppy gets any sicker, I may find myself in an art museum.

Back to Top
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back to Top
CAT FAN WOULD LOVE TO CLAW THIS CREATURE

Sunday, October 8, 1989

Section: TMC: Page: A1

by Stuart Warner

As secretary-treasurer of The Traditional Siamese Breeders and Fanciers Association, Diana Fineran of Jonesborough, Tenn., is a fervent defender of the feline faith. And as an art critic, she's no pussycat, either. In a letter addressed to yours truly, she used terms such `demented,' ' indecent' and `atrocities' to describe the Creatures of the Night show [
Creature Nites of Ohio] at the Canton Art Museum. She suggested that the artist, Stephen Paternites, should be confined to ' the nearest mental institution.' I guess she didn't like the exhibit.

But then she came not to praise Paternites, but to bury his work. She claims that the traditional Siamese cat, which is featured in Paternites'
Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II, is an endangered species. (Domestic animals such as cats are not listed as endangered species.) `We demand that the two displays ... be taken (down) and given a proper and respectful burial!!!!!' she wrote. She also wrote that she was forwarding all articles about the exhibit to an attorney.

Having an inquiring mind, I decided to call and ask if she were considering suing either the museum or the artist. That's when the fur really began to fly. `That's none of your business!' she replied. `But you brought up the subject of an attorney in your letter,' I said. `I know who you are!' she said. `You're the one who said that 101 Things To Do With a Dead Cat is a good book! You don't know anything about the concepts of decency!'

Needless to say, the conversation deteriorated from there. She accused me of misrepresenting myself. True. I said I was a journalist. `You do not have my permission to use anything I say!' she said. `You are just as sick as he (Paternites) is!' I'm not sure about her art expertise, but she does know her columnists.


Back to Top
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back to Top
Back to Top
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All content ©1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------