The following are a few of the articles written about Stephen Paternite's Artwork,
Taken from The Akron Beacon Journal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
**Netscape Users must scroll down to view articles. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional articles and letters: Creature-Nites of Ohio Controversy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOT THE CAT'S MEOW CANTON ART EXHIBIT STIRS FUSS Friday, September 15, 1989 Section: METRO: Page: A1 By Cristal Williams Walker, Beacon Journal staff writer A controversial exhibit using body parts from dead cats and baby dolls opens today, at the Canton Art Institute. The local exhibit may allow local art lovers to join the national debate over controversial art supported by tax money, an issue debated Wednesday, by the U.S. House of Representatives. The House refused to ban federal funds for artwork deemed obscene or indecent. Opponents argued that the issue was not censorship but how to spend public money. The national debate concerns an exhibit of 153 photographs by Robert Mapplethorpe -- 13 of which included images of sadomasochistic homosexual sex. The local debate concerns an exhibit of imaginary animal sculptures fashioned by Akron artist Stephen Paternite from freeze-dried animal parts and baby dolls. He said he was furious that museum officials would suggest censoring his work by requesting that he pull three of his most controversial displays. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
'KATS' MAKE SENSE IN SHOW'S CONTEXT Saturday, September 16, 1989 Section: LIFE STYLE: Page: A1 By Dorothy Shinn, Beacon Journal art critic This show is, in case you've been hibernating the last 24 hours, the talk not only of the area and the state, but the whole country, having been picked up by Cable News Network and most of the wire services by late Friday. Stephen Paternite's exhibit, Creature-Nites of Ohio at the Canton Art Institute through Oct. 29, features both sculptured and real animal parts recombined to form new fantasy creatures, three of which involve the use of baby doll parts. The works causing the most controversy, Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II (homo sapien felis catus), have been compared with some of the more shocking photographs by the late photographer Robert Mapplethorpe. His government-funded photography exhibit showing homosexual activity was canceled this summer in Washington, D.C. In Paternite's exhibit, the use of real cat parts in combination with doll parts is shocking because in these two works the artist obviously had to perform a cat decapitation (not to mention a de-tail-ation). Taken out of the context of the exhibit, these sculptures are jarring -- there's no way around it. But within the context of the show, the works not only make sense, they also tend to lose their shock effect. The exhibit is black humor, a put-on, you see. But it's more. It's a tongue-in-cheek jab at natural history exhibits in which you find stuffed animals in their `natural' environments with plaques telling about their habitats, range, food sources and rarity. Paternite has done this, too, but with made-up animals. One of them, Rackeydeer, was in the All Ohio exhibit in the spring at the Canton museum. It shows a creature that looks like an upright groundhog with deer antlers growing from its back. Another, Robocock, shows a freeze-dried rooster body atop molded plastic mechanical legs. Its counterpart, Robocat, has a freeze-dried cat head and tail on a molded rubber animal body that's been painted silver. A third, Crocoturtle, shows a dried crocodile head emerging from a freeze- dried snapping turtle body. Nearby, the Mechanicsburg Pigeon Massacre refers to the authorized slaughter of 106 pigeons in 1987. In all, there are 24 fantasy creatures, 21 color photographs and a 15-minute video made by Paternite's brother. Paternite said most of his animals are road kills found in the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area. The others -- namely, the freeze-dried cats, crocodiles and turtles -- come from a medical supply company in Chicago that supplies not only pharmacies but taxidermists with freeze-dried animals. Those of us who are shocked and repelled by the idea of dead animals being used in this way have every right to our feelings, but we must stop and think about the implications of this exhibit beyond the shocking face of it. What, for instance, is responsible for all those road kills? Why are cats such an abundant, if grisly, commodity? Who is responsible for, or, should we say, who has dominion over them? The implications go on and on -- it makes a person think. Maybe that's why so many feel shocked. Thinking can have that effect. Back to Top ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW, LET'S ALL PAWS FOR ART APPRECIATION Sunday, September 17, 1989 Section: METRO: Page: C1 by Stuart Warner My hat is off to Akron sculptor Stephen Paternite. He has given me a new appreciation of art. Finally, someone has discovered a good use for cats. You may have read Friday, about the opening of Paternite's exhibit of animal sculptures this weekend at the Canton Art Institute. Cats also are featured in literature, notably in that best seller 101 Things to Do With a Dead Cat. And what is Spuds McKenzie but a rip-off of Morris the Cat and Garfield? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JUST A CRITTER TODAY, BUT IT'S ART TOMORROW Sunday, September 24, 1989 Section: TMC: Page: A1 Stuart Warner What happened to the chicken that didn't make it across the road? It's now an art exhibit in Canton. Oooooh. Only a sick puppy would tell a joke like that. I'm sorry. I'll try not to do it again. I just haven't been able to restrain myself. I've slipped to new depths of sophomoric humor since the opening of Stephen Paternite's dead-pet show at the Canton Art Institute. I hope the artist doesn't take me to court over this. I've never had a Paternite suit filed against me before. Anyway, the most talked-about pieces in the exhibit have been Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II. Each sculpture was created by the fusion of the body parts of dead cats and baby dolls. Naturally, the always art-conscious news media has been intrigued by Paternite's work. Reports of the exhibit have been carried throughout the country. Can a guest-appearance on Geraldo! be far behind? This sort of recognition is certain to inspire other artists. A few years ago, the art world was wowed by Judy Chicago's elaborate creation, The Dinner Party. Will we soon see a down-home sequel composed of freeze-dried road kill? I might suggest West Virginia Feast as a title. Or perhaps the limbs from a dead baboon could be used to give the Venus de Milo those sorely needed arms. Of course, if there's money to be made by putting dead critters on display, no possum ever again will feel safe crossing the street. Not that any have made it yet. Stan Piatt of radio station WNIR in Kent suggested that a best seller of a few years ago should now be retitled 102 Things to Do With a Dead Cat. And it is interesting to note that a currently popular rip-off of that book is 101 Things to Do With a Dead Lawyer. You have to believe that critics might have considered Paternite's exhibit more humane if he had used the body parts of dead attorneys instead of cats. But don't get the idea that anyone should harm a lawyer just for an art show. I'm sure there are plenty who can be found along the side of the road. A lot of unhappy clients drive cars. Cheap shot. Cheap shot. If this puppy gets any sicker, I may find myself in an art museum. Back to Top --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CAT FAN WOULD LOVE TO CLAW THIS CREATURE Sunday, October 8, 1989 Section: TMC: Page: A1 by Stuart Warner As secretary-treasurer of The Traditional Siamese Breeders and Fanciers Association, Diana Fineran of Jonesborough, Tenn., is a fervent defender of the feline faith. And as an art critic, she's no pussycat, either. In a letter addressed to yours truly, she used terms such `demented,' ' indecent' and `atrocities' to describe the Creatures of the Night show [Creature Nites of Ohio] at the Canton Art Museum. She suggested that the artist, Stephen Paternites, should be confined to ' the nearest mental institution.' I guess she didn't like the exhibit. But then she came not to praise Paternites, but to bury his work. She claims that the traditional Siamese cat, which is featured in Paternites' Kiddie Kat and Kiddie Kat II, is an endangered species. (Domestic animals such as cats are not listed as endangered species.) `We demand that the two displays ... be taken (down) and given a proper and respectful burial!!!!!' she wrote. She also wrote that she was forwarding all articles about the exhibit to an attorney. Having an inquiring mind, I decided to call and ask if she were considering suing either the museum or the artist. That's when the fur really began to fly. `That's none of your business!' she replied. `But you brought up the subject of an attorney in your letter,' I said. `I know who you are!' she said. `You're the one who said that 101 Things To Do With a Dead Cat is a good book! You don't know anything about the concepts of decency!' Needless to say, the conversation deteriorated from there. She accused me of misrepresenting myself. True. I said I was a journalist. `You do not have my permission to use anything I say!' she said. `You are just as sick as he (Paternites) is!' I'm not sure about her art expertise, but she does know her columnists. Back to Top ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All content © 1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Back to Top ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All content ©1989 The Akron Beacon Journal and may not be republished without permission. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||